So modelers are saying that an effect that wasn't put into the model doesn't exist because it isn't in the model? How can this be anything but circular reasoning?

I only did enough computer modeling as an undergrad Chemical Engineer to know how easy it is to get nonsensical conclusions. This isn't science, and I agree with the conclusion by adding the final line that Pauli never said.

This isn't right
It isn't wrong
It's just stupid.