Little Ice Age II, The Sequel?
The lingering cool temperatures being experience by much of North America has weather forecasters wondering if we are entering a new Little Ice Age—a reference to the prolonged period of cold weather that afflicted the world for centuries and didn't end until just prior to the American Civil War. From historical records, scientists have found a strong correlation between low sunspot activity and a cooling climate. At the end of May, an international panel of experts led by NOAA and sponsored by NASA released a new prediction for the next solar cycle: Solar Cycle 24 will be one of the weakest in recent memory. Are we about to start a new Little Ice Age?
According to the report, Solar Cycle 24 will peak in May 2013 with a sunspot count well below average. “If our prediction is correct, Solar Cycle 24 will have a peak sunspot number of 90, the lowest of any cycle since 1928 when Solar Cycle 16 peaked at 78,” says panel chairman Doug Biesecker of the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center. This does not mean that we won't feel the results of renewed solar storm activity here on Earth.
“Even a below-average cycle is capable of producing severe space weather,” points out Biesecker. “The great geomagnetic storm of 1859, for instance, occurred during a solar cycle of about the same size we’re predicting for 2013.” A recent report by the National Academy of Sciences found that if a storm similar to the 1859 disturbance—known as the “Carrington Event” after astronomer Richard Carrington who observed the associated solar flare—occurred today, it could cause $1 to 2 trillion in damages to society's high-tech infrastructure and require four to ten years for complete recovery. Reportedly, the 1859 storm electrified transmission cables, set fires in telegraph offices, and produced Northern Lights so bright that people could read newspapers by their glow.

As we reported in Chapter 10 of The Resilient Earth, the most interesting feature of sunspots is that their number increases and decreases in a regular rhythm over about a decade. This regular cycle was first noticed by the German astronomer Samuel Heinrich Schwabe in 1843. This has become known as the solar magnetic activity cycle, or sunspot cycle. The number of sunspots in each cycle is not constant; there have been periods where many sunspots were observed, and others when sunspots seem to disappear altogether. Sightings from China, Korea and Japan between 28 BC and 1743 AD averaged only six sunspots per year. None were observed between 1639 and 1700, a period know as the Maunder Minimum.
The period from roughly 1300 to 1850 is known as the “Little Ice Age,” a period characterized by unusually long and cold winters. Some confine the Little Ice Age to approximately the 16th century to the mid 19th century, but it is generally agreed that there were three temperature minima, occurring around 1650, 1770, and 1850. Each minima separated by slight warming intervals. These periods coincides closely with times of solar inactivity, with some of the worst weather occurring squarely during the Maunder Minimum.

The Maunder Minimum is named after the English astronomer Edward W. Maunder (1851-1928). From studying historical records of sunspot counts, called the sunspot number, Maunder discovered that sunspots were virtually absent during this period, and disappeared altogether during the decade starting in 1670. Astronomers observed only about 50 sunspots during the 70 year period from 1645 to 1715. Normal sunspot activity would have produced 40,000 to 50,000 sunspots.
Already in the midst of the Little Ice Age's colder than average climate, Europe and North America went into a deep freeze: alpine glaciers extended over valley farmland, sea ice crept south from the Arctic, and the famous canals in the Netherlands froze regularly—an event that is rare today. In London, ice festivals were held on the frozen Themes and in New York City people could walk to Manhattan and Staten Island on the ice. On the down side, crops failed and many died of the cold.

In 1991, a pair of Danish meteorologists published a paper in which they pointed out a remarkably strong correlation between the length of the solar activity cycle and the global mean temperature in the northern hemisphere. Not all activity cycles are the same length, with longer cycles of 12-14 years duration seeming to indicate cooler global temperatures than shorter 9-10 year cycles. It is difficult to assess the effect of recent solar cycles on global climate, let alone those from the Maunder minimum, because of the relatively short time span for which detailed observations exist. Climate data for the past 100 years are spotty enough, climate records become sparse to nonexistent when looking back more than a century.
The correlation between temperature and sunspot activity has been commented on before on this site (see “Scientists Discover The Sun Does Affect Earth's Climate”), so I will not go into great detail about it here. However, it is interesting to note that a comparison of sea surface temperature and the number of observed sunspots over the past 150 years or so yeilds an astoundingly close match—much closer than the correlation between CO2 and temperature.

Scientists are not sure how solar activity and space weather are linked to climate here on Earth. They do know that the last time sunspots all but disappeared for an extended period of time our planet experienced a dramatic downswing in temperature. Right now, the solar cycle is in a valley—the deepest of the past century. In 2008 and 2009, the sun set modern records for low sunspot counts, weak solar wind, and low solar irradiance.

There are variations in the 11 year cycle and other cycles of longer duration also seem to be at work here. Naturally, scientists have tried to predict the changing activity of the sun by examining the historical records and, more recently, using computer models. This is not to say that the predictions are always correct, no one correctly predicted the current ebb in solar activity. “In our professional careers, we've never seen anything quite like it,” said Dean Pesnell of the Goddard Space Flight Cente. “Solar minimum has lasted far beyond the date we predicted in 2007.”
“It turns out that none of our models were totally correct," admited Pesnell, NASA's lead representative on the prediction panel. “The sun is behaving in an unexpected and very interesting way.” Though the face of the sun is not as blemish free as it was a few months ago, the latest images from SOHO show sunspot activity is picking up a bit. But the current level of activity is still quite low. In fact, the sun has gone more than two years without a significant solar flare. What does this portend for the weather here on planet Earth?
According to expert long-range forecaster Joe Bastardi, areas from the northern Plains into the Northeast will have a “year without a summer.” This is a reference to the year 1816, also known as the Poverty Year, during which severe and abnormally cold summer weather destroyed crops in Northern Europe, the American Northeast and eastern Canada. According to Bastardi the jet stream is displaced abnormally southward this spring, which is suppressing the number of thunderstorms that can form. The ones that do form in areas of the Ohio Valley and West are forming in places with very cold temperatures, which can lead to thunderstorms more electrically active than normal.
Despite claims by global warming activists that rising temperatures are extending growing seasons around the world, the opposite seems to be happening this year. Cool weather has pushed growth of Western Canada's wheat and barley crop at least 10 days behind schedule, according to the Canadian Wheat Board. “You're pushing development into a period with better likelihood of getting a frost,” said Bruce Burnett, director of weather and market analysis for the Canadian Wheat Board. “It's not particularly what we need at this moment. It's just too cool.”
Proving that this isn't only a Northern Hemisphere phenomenon, Brazil may cut this year’s corn output forecast for a third consecutive time, as a frost in several states caused more crop damage. According to Silvio Porto, agriculture policy director, corn growers may harvest less than the 49.9 million metric tons forecast previously announced as frost struck Parana and Mato Grosso do Sul states in the past two weeks. “It’s a worrying situation as corn has already suffered with a severe drought,” Porto said. “Still, it’s too early to know the size of the damage.”
New record cold temperatures have been seen in a number of locations around the world, marking this as one of the coldest springs in years. With reports of late season frost and snow falls, some are already forecasting a very cool summer. Not trying to sound alarmist or start any rumors but scientists' best conjecture regarding the conditions that signal the start of a new glacial period are cool, cloudy summers. Is this the beginning of Little Ice Age II, the sequel? If so, we will look back fondly on the time we were all so concerned about global warming. Remember, in the words of SF author Orson Scott Card, “'global warming' is just another term for 'good weather.'”
Be safe, enjoy the interglacial and stay skeptical.


![[SOHO Sun Spot Image]](http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/mdi_igr/512/latest.jpg)

Very Interesting
I love reading about the history of the earth and watching shows like "how the earth was made". I love this kind of stuff. I appreciate all of the great information you have given us. I work for a personal loans company and I dont have time to do all of this awesome research like you. I really am interested in the Mini Ice age.
Things Are Really Changing
I'm not really sure what will happen in terms of an ice age. All I know is that the weather is going quite nuts. This year we didn't actually have a spring. It was basically winter right up until June. We would have a day here and there that seemed like spring and then winter would kick back in. It's just horrible.
Christine
I was wondering why the
I was wondering why the people in the 17th century were having so many problems settleing in America and growing their own food, does the problem also have to do with the fact that the sun had less sun spots at this time, and did this have any effect on the early American Colonies?
Also how were the Indians effected?
Cold summer, indeed...
Well, here it is now the beginning of November, and it has finally stopped raining, some 6 weeks late. Here in NC, temps in the summer months are regularly over 90 degrees. This year, we saw 90 only about 3 time, where I am. I am 65, and I cannot remember a summer this cold and wet. I was reminded of descriptions of the early 1800s Year Without a Summer. I think I will invest some money in stock in sled manufacturers...
Next ice age?
Till now it is a verbal fight between people who believe that we have a global warming and those who believe that all is normal. There are so many factors which influence our climate and one main factor of them is the sun. I have read many times about the cycles of the sun but I have to confess never so detailed as here - thank you for posting, Gipsy
Solar Cycle
I have just read in New Scientist that the Solar Cycle only tends to average out at 11 years. I can never find the article when I want, but it mentioed that a few scientists had used pictoral data from around 1784, it may have been astronomer Johann Staudecher's work. From the angle of the recorded Sunspots the scientists concluded much shorter cycles back then. This has yet to be confirmed, but would not be a surprise as an 11 year cycles for a few billion years doesn't kind of sit right with me!
Keith Driscoll
http://www.searchnfindarticles.com/Category/Science/248
MYSTERY ANARTICA TEMPRETURES
WHY IS THE CENTER OF ANARTICA ALLMOST COLD AS SPACE?
THERE HAS BEEN THEORYS ABOUT THIS,BUT THE SUN BOMBARDS EARTH WITH RADIATION, USUALLY STRONG,BUT A LULL OF 2YRS IS A CLEAR SIGN OF COOLING!
THE MAGNETIC FIELD OF EARTH HAS WEAKEND VASTLY OF LATE,IS THIS A COINCIDENCE ?
TOGETHER THERE SEEM TO BE A RELATIONSHIP AND THE CONTROLING FACTOR OF THE WEATHER HERE ON OUR PLANET!
NO WEATHER HAS MELTED THE 16,MILLION CUBIC MILES OF ICE IN ANARTICA IN MILLIONS OF YRS.
THE ICE IS VAST AND WITH ANCHIENT ORIGENS OF UNKNOWN TRUE AGE,THEY HAVE DRILLED,DUG,TESTED,SONAR PROBED,AND DO HAVE A 9 FOOT SALAMANDER WITH 1"TEETH TO SHOW OFF FOR THAT!
FORCASTERS DATA IS NOT EVEN CLOSE FOR A FUTURE PREDICTION MODEL!
HOWEVER ENOUGH MONEY IS PUT IN HAND FOR CPU BASED MODEL TO BACK THE GLOBAL WARMING THEORY THAT CERTAINLY PROVES TOO ME A AGENDA OF UNTRUTH NEEDS BACKING UP SOMEHOW,ANYWAY THEY CAN!
ALL PROBLEMS CAN BE FIXED WITH A TAX AND THATS THE PROBLEM?
HOW DO YOU SELL THIS TAX TOO PLANET EARTH INHABITANTS?
SAY IT ENOUGH AND PEOPLE WILL BELIVE IT,THATS STEP ONE,BACK IT UP WITH A BUNCH OF PLAUSABLE FACTS,BIBICAL DOOM SCENARIOS ALLWAYS WORKED IN CHURCH,THE END JUSTIFIES NOTHING!
TRUTH LIES IN THE SUN MAGNETOSPHERE RELATIONSHIP AND ANARTICA IS THE ROSETTA STONE TOO FIGURE THIS OUT!IMOP
THEN OCEAN CURRENTS AND JET STREAM EVENTS COULD BE MORE RESONABLY UNDERSTOOD!!
VOTE THE TAX FIXERS OUT,AND PUT WISDOM AHEAD OF POPULARITY AND WE HAVE SOME HOPE!IMOP
DO TAXES FIX THE WEATHER,NO, THERE NOT BUILDING A CO2 OXIGEN CONVERTER REACTOR ARE THEY,IM A TROUBLE MAKER IN SOMEONES EYES,CAUSE IM NOT BELIVING THE UNTRUTH,AND IM NOT STUPID ENOUGH TO BE TAXED FOR NOTHING !!!
HORRIBLE SCIENCE HAS REARED ITS UGLY HEAD TOO FAR,BECAUSE THOSE WITH TRUTH HAVE THE UNBREAKABLE ARMOR !
HOPE WE LOOK BACK AND REMEMBER,NUCLEAR WINTER,GLOBAL WARMING AND THE LIKE WAS SO FUNNY!!
I DONT THINK THE CANALS OF MARS ARGUMENT IS OVER YET IS IT!
THE QUANTUM PROTON INSTANTAINOUS DATA TRANSFER EXPERIMET LEFT THE SPEED OF LIGHT IN THE DUST,SO IM LOOKING FOR SOME MORE UNSOLVED MYSTERIOUS SUBJECTS THATS COMPELLS ME TOO INVESTIGATE?
Interesting Speculative Statistics
What are your thoughts on this article?
Dr. Timo Niroma and Jupiter's effect on Sunspots
Dr. Niroma's hypotheses is certainly quite interesting and he has obviously spent a lot of time working on it. Since there is no widely accepted explanation for the timing of sunspot cycles his speculation remains a valid as anyone else's. Jovan sized planets can certainly raise a tide on the stars they orbit, depending on their mass and orbital distance. Jupiter's average distance from the Sun is 778,412,020 km (5.203 times Earth) and its mass is 1.8987 x 1027 kg (317.82 times Earth). I find it noteworthy that, as massive as it is, Jupiter's greater distance from the Sun means it only has around 12 times the gravitational tug on our star as Earth does. I'm not sure if I accept all Niroma has to say but he is predicting another ice age (glacial period) or at least another Little Ice Age episode due to a lack of solar activity. We will know if he is right in a couple of hundred years. Thanks for the link.
Solar Influence on the Canadian prairies and elsewhere
Garnett et al 2006 revealed for the Canadian prairies that May-July tends to be wetter (drier) with low (high)sunspot activity. The Canadian prairies May-July between 1950 and 2004 tended to be wettest when sunspot activity was less than 70 sunspots per month and driest when sunspot activity was more than than 100 sunspots per month. This is consistent with the work of Svensmark and Calder, who in 2007 demonstrated that low sunspot activity results in increased cloud cover on a global scale, especially below 3.2 km, because of increased cloud seeding by cosmic rays. The amount of incoming cosmic rays is modulated by the solar activity. Finally, Karner (2008) has shown that low sunspot activity is associated with less irradiance or a less bright such that surface temperatures in Europe and Asia were lower. Hence, as a general rule low sunspot activity appears to be associated with an an increase in cosmic rays which seed clouds at a low levels and surface temperatures are lower as a result of less solar irradiance. January through May of 2009 there has been an average of 1.5 sunspots per month the lowest since 1913.
E.R.Garnett
Some References
Garnett,E.R, Nirupama,N. Haque,C.E. and Murty, T.S. 2006. Correlates of Canadian Prairie summer rainfall: implications for crop yields.Climate Research:Vol.32:25-33
Karner,O. 2008 ARIMA representation for daily solar irradiance and surface air temperature (submiited to Elsevier).
Svensmark and Calder, 2007. Chilling Stars (A new theory of Climate Change) A book.
For more on Svensmark and Cosmic Rays
Past Temperatures - You are in luck, it is charted out
There is a website that shows past temperatures (taken from ice cores and deep sea benthic core drilling) that shows what past temperatures were all the way back to 500 million years ago. Go to http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Temperature_Gallery and you can see this all broken out with different time periods easily charted out. From this site you will see that we have had an ice age averaging about 93,000 years with a brief 12,000 to 15,000 year warm interglacial repeatedly for the past million years. Our current Holocene interglacial warmth has been trending down during its 12,000 year history.
Global Warming Art
That site is a good source for graphical representations of historical climate data. A note of caution however, as you travel farther back in time from the present the less accurate and reliable the data become. That applies to both temperature and atmospheric gas level data. This is because the temperatures from times past were not measured by thermometers, either because there were no instruments or, farther back, no people to make the observations. All of these historical measurements are based on proxy data, which we explain in detail in chapter 14, of The Resilient Earth. The levels of uncertainty in readings more than a few hundred years old is greater than the magnitude of temperature change that have global warming activists so hot and bothered. Like I always say, stay skeptical, particularly when dealing with data from ancient times.
Past Temperature Proxies
Thank you for the chapter link, but it looks like Chapter 13 is probably what you wanted to link to me about O-18 and other long-term climatic proxies instead of the computer modelling of Chapter 14. I am definitely buying your book.
Oops!
You are right, the correct chapter is 13, Experimental Data and Error, not chapter 14. How embarrassing, having written it you'd think I'd get the chapter references correct! Thanks, and thanks for buying the book.
A note about the PDF files—they contain the text of the book as published but they also have many more illustrations. We initially formatted the book as a full color, oversized coffee table book but soon realized that it would have to sell for ~$120 if published that way. The soft cover edition has all the text, fewer illustrations and is in black & white, allowing it to sell for under $20 (US). In many ways Al and I like the soft cover edition better than the glitzy one, and we hope everyone will like it as well.
Weather 1850's
I've recently looked for historical weather records because I have a letter written by my ancestry's in Dec.1856, describing very poor corps and a early frost, a number of family members died. In looking around at different records I found a list of volcanoes which had erupted in (1855/56) and by the look of this article, that was also a period of low sun spots. Interesting article thanks.
Does anyone know where I could find some weather records for that period (1856's) in the area of Nova Scotia / Northeast Coast US?
Nobody knows what will happen next
Its far too early, in my view, to say if the Earth is going to significantly cool. The earth's climate is a "loosely coupled non-linear system" and even if all of the proxy indicators for cooling appear, the Earth could still "warm".
The real problem is that prognostication on basis of this or that proxy is as old as humanity itself. Everybody wants to know the future, but nobody knows what will happen - its just that some pretend to know.
The greatest unknown is the future behaviour of the Sun - nobody knows what will happen next with the Sun. I wrote about the quote you mentioned on my generalist blog The PhD Effect and Scientific Prediction where I reinterpret what was said thus:
“We were wrong” says Dean Pesnell of the Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA’s lead representative on the panel. “We don’t know what’s going on“
That, I submit, would have been far more accurate and informative a statement than what was actually offered by the NOAA panel, which continues to give false assurances as to its predictive performance which are at odds with its recent history. But will those phrases actually be passed through any of their lips? I don’t think so, somehow.
The ability of scientists in the glare of publicity to gloss over their previous failures to predict anything, even by chance, appears to be infinite.
Nobody knows what will happen next
Hi. This is my first time on this site so I hope you will forgive my ignorance.
Though I agree with you that no one can know what will happen in the future, I believe we can, (within acceptable error margins, whatever that may be) predict some things. Only because just about everything in the known universe behaves in cycles, and cycles of relatively very long lengths.
So if we want to know the effects of the sun on the rest of the system in the next say 200 years, that is a very short time in the cycle, relatively speaking, so some predictions may be made fairly accurately.
What is your opinion?
Strange Days Strange Skies
Good warning. Always good to save up, store up on food. However, what about the blocking out of the sun by all of the chemtrails and man-made weather weaponization. I think that this travestry should be stopped first before worrying about mother-nature's intent.
Year Without a Summer
Although 1816 is agood example of what can happen when Mother Nature goes cold, you should mention that the "year without a summer" in 1816 has been atributed to the eruption of Mount Tambora, in Indonesia, in 1815.
You are correct
The proximate cause of the dismal summer weather in 1816 was indeed the volcanic eruption of Mount Tambora the previous year. Airborne particulates from the eruption caused additional cooling on top of the generally cooler climate of the time. The references in the popular media don't really match up with the historical or scientific facts. The facts in my post are correct, however, when talking about the correlation between sunspots and climate. As usual, behind the media's messed up historical references there are semi-appropriate analogies.
Well done!
Nicely written article. Don't know if we're headed for a new LIA, but the world has clearly gotten cold. I've collected pointers to some of the cold stories here:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/south-hemisphere-record-early-snow/
There has also been a crop failure of sorts in Argentina:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/argentine-drought-crop-failure/
So my take on things is that it will be getting a lot colder and we are likely to have some "food challenges" in the next few years. The Brazil comment in particular was interesting. I'd heard about impact on coacoa, but not about corn...
Trees, plants and more plants!
Perhaps we should plant many more trees, flowers and foliage plants, especially in urban areas, and keep CO2 polluting industries near forests etc.
Photosynthesis by plants changes CO2 into living breathing and breathable oxygen.
Green should REALLY mean green as in more plants, more trees, more greenery!
About article
Wow. Very nice article! It helped me very much. Thanks for it.